In, Patrick Kirk V. First American Title Insurance Company; It started with class actions involving ethical violations including: kick-backs to lenders for referring clients, escrow related fees exceeding state limits, while not giving discounts to clients who qualified for them, and specific fee over-charges (messenger fees, wire transfer fees, and sub escrow fees).
Four years after the litigation began for the class actions, the attorneys representing the First American Title Ins. Company, moved to another law firm. An attorney from their new firm had previously received confidential information about the First American Title Ins. co. cases. When the firm learned of this previous contact regarding the attorney they established an ethical screening around said attorney. Leading to an order from the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, which disqualified their firm based on allegations of violating consumer protection laws.
The firm appealed the Superior Courts decision, at which time the Court of Appeals of California, 2nd Appellate District, Division 3, reviewed whether the disqualification was legitimate based on the facts. The outcome of court of appeals decision reversed the order that had disqualified the firm and remanded the case to the trial courts for further proceedings, as per (Rules of Professional Conduct, Rule 3-310-E).
(2010). Kirk v. First American Title Ins. Co. California: Lexis Nexis. Retrieved August 22, 2010, from LexisNexis (2010 Cal. App. LEXIS 478 ).
In the after-math of these proceedings and while seeking more information I found that By a six to one vote, the California State Supreme Court declined to review the Court of Appeal decision in Kirk v. First American Title Insurance Company (2010) 183 Cal.App.4th 776.
(2010). Retrieved September 4, 2010, from http://www.lawfirmrisk.com/2010/06/california-supreme-court-upholds.html
legalethicsforum.com
(2010). PATRICK KIRK et al., Plaintiffs and Respondents, v. FIRST AMERICAN TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY et al., Defendants and Appellants. Retrieved September 3, 2010, from Lexis Nexis Academic.
Wednesday, September 8, 2010
California: Law Firm allegedly Violates Consumer Protection Laws
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Smith patten used to perform in an on board control place for U. S. Airways. Though we have no concept what that officially requires, it obviously includes handling something in-flight.
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteDow Patten is a famous attorney is south California, he has solve thousand of cases in few years, His partner Spencer smith and smith patten both can handle different type of cases like, sexual harassment and corporate justice.
ReplyDeleteYou know your projects stand out of the herd. There is something special about them. It seems to me all of them are really brilliant!
ReplyDeleteEstate Lawyer
Greetings, super job, basically wasnt so busy with my searching I just read your full blog. I must say i have to express gratitude! Click Here
ReplyDelete